Glossary

Retainer vs project: how should you buy video?

A video retainer buys ongoing production capacity at an agreed cadence and cost. A project buys a defined set of deliverables once, for a fixed fee.

The choice is usually framed as a budgeting question and is actually a strategy question. A project makes sense when you need to prove one thing once — a launch, a rebrand, a single campaign. A retainer makes sense when the thing you are trying to change takes repeated exposure, which describes most B2B positioning problems.

The economics differ in a way that is easy to miss. On a project, production planning happens once and is amortised across one set of deliverables. On a retainer it happens once and is amortised across a year, which is why cost per asset falls sharply after the first quarter and why comparing a retainer’s monthly fee against a single project fee is the wrong comparison.

The comparison

Retainer compared with project-based production
Retainer Project
You are buying Ongoing capacity at a cadence A defined deliverable set
Cost per asset Falls over time Fixed at commissioning
Visual consistency Builds across the year Per project
Planning overhead Once, then amortised Every time
Best when Positioning needs repeated exposure One thing needs proving once
Risk Under-using booked capacity Restarting from scratch each time
Typical structure Monthly, or quarterly shoot days Fixed scope and fee

Which one fits your situation

In practice

DOT works both ways and structures retainers around actual volume rather than fixed packages. For Rompslomp, an always-on partnership produces podcast episodes and customer films on a consistent cadence, each hero piece generating a full package of platform cutdowns — content that compounds across the calendar rather than spending itself in a launch week.

See retainer and project structures on the B2B video page.

Last updated: